By Thermal Detonator
And something else becomes evidently wrong when we look at Adnan Bukhari’s neighbor and short-lived roommate Abdul Rahman al-Omari, who was originally thought to be suspected American Airlines Flight 11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari. Adnan Bukhari was able to notify the authorities that Abdul Rahman was alive, by calling him on his cell phone while in FBI custody.
On September 14th, CNN’s Eileen O’Connor reported that Adnan was taken into custody and through his lawyer, told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Abdul Rahman was “actually safe in Saudi Arabia and would be presenting himself to US officials” in Saudi Arabia, as they were already told he would be presenting himself the day before. O’Connor stated on behalf of Adnan, that the associating of him and Abdul Rahman to the 9/11 attacks was a case of mistaken identity.
But the media continued to make a mistake, and on September 15th the first 8 photos of hijackers were displayed on CNN, 4 being allocated as the supposed hijackers of Flight 11: Mohamed Atta, Waleed al-Shehri, Wail al-Shehri, and Abdulaziz al-Omari.
There was no photo yet for Satam al-Suqami, the supposed 5th hijacker of Flight 11, so I assume his unscathed passport wasn’t discovered yet at Ground Zero, which could be a significant reason why his identity was not displayed sooner.
However, the photo of Abdulaziz al-Omari is falsely incorrect, it belongs to Adnan Bukhari’s neighbor: the living Abdul Rahman al-Omari who had already confirmed to officials that he was alive before CNN displayed these 8 hijacker photos shown below:
Proceeding, Abdul Rahman al-Omari did finally reveal himself to the public in an interview with CNN’s Susan Candiotti on September 21st , 2001. Funnily enough, the CNN crew travelled all the way to Saudi Arabia to meet him. He was the only falsely-accused hijacker subjected to identity theft to make some type of public appearance.
But what still remains a mystery is: Just how and why were there 3 different al-Omari’s?— and at this rate, could there have possibly been other name-related identicalities? As the BBC also reported, another man by the name of Abdulaziz Al-Omari (spelled “Abdelaziz” below, bottom right) was a Saudi Telecoms engineer suspected of being a hijacker who had lost his passport while studying in Denver, Colorado. However, he appeared in an English-language Arab newspaper stating that he was alive.
The Three Alomari’s
But something has been overlooked about Abdul Rahman al-Omari, since there is another chain of events (a series of cover-ups it seems) that is unfamiliar with Truthers, and of course, not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report either.
According to an FBI affidavit released on October 4, 2001, and also mentioned on his Wikipedia page, Abdul Rahman al-Omari was “associated for SADA Lines International (a Saudi Arabian airline) and Saudi Flight Ops at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York.”
And for those unfamiliar or having no inclination of suspicion, John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) is also where United Airlines Flight 23 (UA 23) was about to take off and become the 5th plane hijacked on 9/11. This potential and frightening hijacking fared unsuccessful, due to the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) timely instituted no-flight ban preceding the initiary attacks. UA 23 was at JFK headed for Los Angeles (as were 3 of the 4 official hijacked planes) until the pilots received word from the Air Traffic Control about the FAA’s no-fly ban, demanding departing flights to remain grounded and to secure the cockpit. Four passengers in first-class demonstrated suspicious behavior upon receiving news about this.
As the plane was taxiing back to the boarding gate, these 4 men appearing to be of Arab descent drew attention to themselves, acting hostile toward the flight crew about the decision to not takeoff, and refused orders to remain seated. According to an New York Times article, they pleaded with the flight crew, an investigator stating:
“These guys got belligerent, and said something like, ‘We’ve got to be on this plane,’ an official said. “They expressed a desire to remain on the plane and resisted getting off.”
Once the plane arrived at the gate, the 4 men hurried off the plane, fortunately for their own sake avoiding any confrontation with airport security. However, security officials examined unclaimed luggage from UA 23, finding: Box cutters, knives, Al-Qaeda will instruction sheets, and Qur’ans. Despite this, the false IDs found in conjunction with the aforementioned materials prevented investigators from ever finding out who exactly these 4 men were, or so we are told.
If UA 23 was not intriguing enough, federal authorities believed there were additional planes that were either carrying or about to carry hijackers on 9/11. There are numerous reports to back these claims with other airports and flights that day that were either cancelled, or forced to land and had suspicious passengers and items found indicating more hijacked planes that were aborted or foiled, possibly in the amount of 10 or more planes.
We will examine similar occurrences of such peculiarity, but without further ado: Just how easy does it become to prove when again, we are dealing with potential hijackings from the same airports of hijacker origin as soon as the airports opened back up? This ultimately leaves, unsurprisingly, more information and possible cover-ups to decipher.
For the Truther who’s imagination has diverted into the cauldron of laughable 9/11 kookery, the idea of you possibly being hoodwinked into accepting the “no hijackers on the planes!”narrative should become abundantly clear after reading Part 2. I will continue to put forth the years of personal research to exonerate and explain how 9/11 was supposed to be an event boasting a scarier magnitude than reality played out.
9/13 and JFK Airport
Because if the 11th was not terrible enough, two days later on the 13th while federal authorities were continuing their investigation into Tuesday’s JFK incident, another JFK situation occurred around 4:00 PM. Several people had been arrested, possessing fake pilot licenses and weaponry, subsequently followed by reports announcing all New York area airports had been evacuated and shut down. In following, arrests and the detainment of a dozen or more people (men, edit) took place at New York’s LaGuardia airport. It does not get any more telling when it is equally as ignored by the 9/11 Commission Report as it is by the un-researched Truth movement. (Site)
This was two days after 9/11. Airports were only just starting to reopen for the first time after the no-flight ban, and the matter was reported by all the three-letter networks including some foreign media entities who kept it spinning for 16 hours till the next day into 9/14.
Details of the reports throughout the night included that they were carrying knives, fraudulent IDs, flight certificates from Florida flight schools, wearing airport attire marked as “crew”, one of them was a woman and a possible 2nd. Some reports indicate that airport staff recognized some of them from Tuesday while also using a recent FBI watch list that their names appeared on.
Some of the reports also indicated that to two of them were arrested much earlier in the day at LaGuardia posing as father and son trying to purchase a ticket to San Jose with false IDs, including one as a pilot license.
Two of the people detained at JFK were posing as flight crew staff and a pilot who had his brother’s ID. 3 others detained had already boarded UA Flight 133 headed from JFK to Los Angeles, but were pulled off the plane by police and SWAT team who stormed in through the back door while the plane was delayed on the tarmac, several passengers witness one of the detainees struggle and resist arrest with the officers.
By the next day September 14th around 9:00 a.m., reports started coming that authorities believed the people they had detained at JFK and LaGuardia airports were not involved in reactivating continued hijacking operations or being part of 9/11, and they released most of the suspects except for one, who remained arrested for some unknown reasons other than being labeled as the first material witness in the investigation. Most of the networks would not go to any further details expect for ABC News.
It was a major media retraction and a bad one, that even Senator and speaker of the house and at the time, future Vice President, good ole reliable Joe Biden appeared more than once, attempting to disregard the reports and under undermine the suspects arrested as copycats or “screwballs “. Of course, we can trust Joe Biden since he was having meetings before and after 9/11 with Porter Goss, Bob Graham and General Mahmoud Ahmed from Pakistan, who was later linked to $100,000 that was wired to Mohammed Atta. But without having received any detail of what really occurred at JFK and LaGuardia, ole Joe blabbered for a moment but mostly stood there like a moron and choked when ABC’s Peter Jennings started to inquire detail to why he felt that this wasn’t connected to Tuesday, but the next morning on 9/14, Joe officially says there was no weapons and that it was not foiled attempts to hijack more planes, that it was just people who attended an airline conference who just happened to be possessing flight crew gear in their luggage, nearly all coincidence is his excuse, and then diverts the subject to compare all the confusion and turmoil they were going through in DC with bomb threats.
The material witnessed still arrested from JFK remained detained and as reports later arose on the evening of 9/14, revealed that he was the male suspect who wasn’t cooperating with authorities, and was the person who tried to pass off as a pilot, but with his brother’s ID while also having a pilot license in his name with an address belonging to Osama bin Laden’s (OBL) brother who lives in Boston.
This first 9/11 material witness arrest was instantly followed after by what’s been titled as one of the “20th hijacker”, Zacharias Moussaoui, and Mohammed Jaweed Azmath and Ayub Ali Khan who we will touch on further head. And like all the other hundreds of arrests that occurred after 9/11, there stories just disappeared and withered away as authorities seemed to want to minimize culpability.
However, It was also reported a few days after 9/11 that a photo of a suspected terrorists in Canada, Mohammed Zeki Mahjoub, who was in front a fake backdrop of the World Trade Center, was found in the luggage of one of the 9/11 hijackers. Mahjoub was already known by authorities to have met and worked for OBL as an agricultural engineer for his al-Damazin farms in Sudan.
One thing that’s worth remembering that the truth movements also use to be well coerced in, but has now long forgotten since the supposed assassination, is that OBL was never wanted by the FBI for 9/11 because they never had enough credible evidence to prosecute him. As more corrupt as things became, you would think authorities would have collected all this evidence and this arrest from JFK and use it in a case against OBL and for the War on Terror going into Afghanistan, but they didn’t.
And when you have the notes inside the anthrax letters saying “Death to America, Death to Israel, Allah is Great” which was also used to blame Iraq with the help of Senator John McCain (Rot In Hell) and Israeli intelligence, and other trails left for authorities to speculate OBL’s network, it seems clear that whatever organized Arab interests that handled this part of the planes operation, had also the clear intention to frame OBL and maybe even wreck the image of the Bin Laden family dynasty as well as benefit from destabilizing Iraq, Libya and Syria.
Now in adding to a plausible modus operandi theory given with the details that occurred at JFK might be an indication that these suspects, as well as the 9/11 hijackers may have had some knowledge or inside access to the overall vicinity of the airport as they did. How do we not know that they may had gotten their access intel from Abdul Rahman al-Omari who had conveniently left the country right before 9/11 with his ID being used by Abdulaziz al-Omari?
There’s a popular theory among the Truther-savoy Jew counters, that the Israeli-owned airport Security Company ICTS International may have had something to do with why there has never been any security video from Boston Logan International Airport of the hijackers boarding Flights 11 and United Airlines 175, and that maybe that the Mossad and US military did a joint operation from there taking the passengers to a secret landing base while mocking the real flight to their targets, and either dealing with the passengers by executing them in some other means or brought them there to be part of some elaborate job to making phone calls to some scripted story the government’s already drawn out. Those who might have their heads screwed on tight, theorize that maybe ICTS International helped the hijackers get on their flights with weapons, evading gate cameras as well.
Laxed at Logan
In either case, ICTS International is not worthy of solely focusing on due to circumstances prior, because in actuality, airport security and service before 9/11 was actually very shotty. United Airlines, American Airlines and Delta Air Lines were all sued or fined heavy for breaking major codes and security violations before 9/11. Both Boston Logan and Newark Liberty airports had security breaches broken before 9/11.
Especially when there’s this case in late July of 1999 where a 19 year old snuck on board a British Airways flight to London and then Israel, originally departing from Boston Logan. Abraham Derman was the stowaway disguised in a Hasidic outfit, and was able to do by penetrating through Logan’s security at the Airport near the parked airliners, and said he had done this stunt for some sort of initiation to impress two Mossad agents.
So much for ICTS in the 9/11 modus operandi.
And a very interesting piece to also support the claim of vulnerable or weak security at Logan actually reflects back to the Oklahoma City bombing with Hussain al-Hussaini, who was once suspected as being John Doe #2 accompanying Timothy McVeigh’s in the Ryder rental truck.
Relying on readers already being familiar with OKC bombing conspiracy theories; there are ones claiming an Arab cell or Arabs being in another vehicle near the crime scene of the bombing, and there is credible witness to these accounts. However, the manhunt for John Doe #2 ended when authorities claimed he didn’t exist, and also, that there wasn’t a white supremacist connection involved in the bombing either, although some witnesses claim that John Doe #2 was Andreas Strassmeir (who may have possibly been a Mossad asset in the story handling both rings) who at the bare minimal did have some influence to do the bombing, and may have set up the connections to do it.
Even though he was never detained or charged for the OKC bombing, Hussain al-Hussaini has also sued authors who have tried to implicate him, but ironically, he actually worked at Boston Logan after the Oklahoma City bombing, and according to Doug Hagmann writing for Canada Free Press on March 11, 2011:
“Confidential psychiatric records confirm that in 1997, Hussain al-Hussaini made a foreboding prediction about a future event to take place at Boston Logan International Airport”, and that according to those records prior to 9/11, al-Hussaini suffered anxiety and panic attacks regarding his airport job and checked into a psychiatric hospital to seek treatment. He told his therapist when asked about the source of his trepidation, “if something happens there, I will be a suspect.”
It’s also rather strange that with some the supposed 9/11 culprits, these cells seem to go back Oklahoma pre-9/11 for some time, like with the French-born of Moroccan descendent, Zacarias Moussaoui who attended a flight school in Oklahoma City prior to moving back to Minnesota and being arrested on August 16, 2001.
For those aware about the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reports on Israeli art students in Florida also living in Florida and elsewhere, on April 30, 2001, an Air Force alert was issued from Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City concerning “possible intelligence collection being conducted by Israeli Art Students.”
And also another interesting note with Oklahoma is Adnan Bukhari again, where on September 19th; an FAA employee named James P. Hopkins was fired for independently going through FAA records and reporting to the FBI that Bukhari had trained at the FAA’s academy in Oklahoma City twice, in 1991 and 1998. Seems pretty odd to keep taking flight schools here, doesn’t it?
But back to the point about airport security, I understand with a lot of evidence of Israeli hands all over the place, it sounds good to implicate ICTS International, but there’s a higher possibility that maybe some of those hijackers got on those flights disguised as airport employees is also major a possibility too.
For example, have a look at the 9/11 episode on the first season ‘Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura’. I know the last two series touched upon the typical no plane Pentagon theory and Judy Wood’s ridiculous space ray free energy theory, and that the network in general that broadcasted this series is chock full of trash reality shows. But take a step back and consider this.
Jessie interviews Ground Zero worker Mike Malone who swears he saw one of the black boxes get recovered within the first 3 weeks of the cleanup, and later, it was confirmed to him by other fellow co-workers that two more boxes were found where in the case of the official story, none of the black boxes were supposed to be found.
The most intriguing thing about the episode was the final revelation through Mike Malone, who happens to also know former air traffic controllers from Boston Logan and others who worked with American Airlines, who tells Jessie that the people working at the control towers said “the airline people said the hijackers were in the cockpit of American Airlines while it was still on the runway, before it even took off”, backed by Jessie’s counterpart Braverman who follows up with: “Malone says, that somebody on the ground knew a hijacker was in the cockpit, somebody else on the ground let that plane takeoff”
With that much information still with little detail most would be inclined to think that the hijackers took over plane as soon as it was taxing itself onto the runway. I’m not sure what to think, but it might answer why there is no video of the hijackers boarding Flight 11 & 175, and maybe it has to do with them getting access through the airport as some of the same methods the suspects at JFK and LaGuardia on 9/13 were detained for.
Because It’s also interesting that on 9/13 before New York airports started to shut down because of the suspects detained at JFK and LaGuardia airports, Newark where United Airlines Flight 93 had originally token off from, had already closed down before 3:00p.m, because Federal agents surrounded a Saudi Arabian jumbo airliner full of passengers and apprehended and detained all the flight crew from that plane, including the pilots.
I would think because of this, authorities were thinking in the direction of people working within Saudi Airlines being involved in this after having dealt with the Bukhari’s, Amer Kamfar and al-Omari who were all trained Saudi Airlines pilots. This again could be another reason why there was no security video released of the 4 Flight 93 hijackers from Newark Liberty either.
Which brings me back to the point that I’m trying to assess here with all these Saudi Arabian Airline students in Vero Beach, Bukhari and al-Omari, in regards to their previous training, work experiences as well as set of unusual circumstances, alibis and activities that play in concert to the 9/11 hijackings.
Is it safe to suggest that maybe they might have also been involved in the 9/11 conspiracy, knowing or unknowing the enormity of the range and plans of the attacks, but were somehow operatives assigned in place to have their identities used to give time and play to flee for the handling living hijackers that painted themselves (the Hamburg cell) to be linked to OBL, and or even further to assist culprits with gathering intel that would help in transactions for the operation?
[edited by Art Deal 01/22/2019]