By Thermal Detonator
There’s been too much disinformation within the 9/11 truth movement and alternative media for the past 5 years, and being the concerned activists and self-proclaimed alt-media analyst I am, I’ve spent the past couple years looking back at it and also started sifting through actual live news reports from during and after 9/11, and what conclusion I’ve come to, is that I fear the movement itself was intentionally set up as disinformation from the beginning, either by intention or opportunist over emphasizing theoretical physics no different than how government officials and commissions have done themselves in previous covers ups (belief in magic bullets, the same way Truthers believe in magic planes). Very little of what’s being spread by so called Truthers these days in regards to other conspiracy theories, are just poor attempts to diagnosis every major event as a False Flag that neither ends up being the case.
There is too much information available at one’s fingertips these days, and too many people with too much time on their hands, and lot of opportunist with mediocre editing skills and YouTube channel’s galore, all in their nice little safe-space, echoing chamber.
It’s similar in contrast to alt-media as to what I recently heard from actor Denzel Washington say when he was asked on his thoughts with the current state of media and the hype of Fake News, and he responded with “What is the long-term effect of too much information? One of the effects is the need to be first, not even, to be true anymore”. And that’s what exactly what’s the problem with this so called “truth” movement or alt-media, its drive is only about getting more hits, gaining clout and any sort of compensations no matter what, rather than having standards and integrity nor caution or care to who they might hurt or dishonor.
Very little of what’s being said by Truthers in regards to 9/11 isn’t true either, and because of it, may in fact be the results of why we have these poor attempts of what we call alt-media and “Conspiritainment”. Rather so, Truthers keep themselves consumed in their own standard comforts of intrigue, still regurgitating the awe of graphic evidence of destruction to the World Trade Center on 9/11, prophesying this macabre symbol either to decline into a hole of fear or the naive assumption that it’s the pinnacle of all proof, the smoking gun to solve and someday bring truth, justice and accountability for who was truly responsible.
Sure, it looks like explosives were used in the World Trade Center, and all the live witness accounts seems to validate this. But you don’t need an architect to tell you what explosions look, or sound like. Nor do you need one to claim that Nano-thermite was found, when it’s something as exotic as the event itself in the first place, which neither side of the debate can produce it to make a case.
This 5 part article is not focused on the destruction or graphic evidence of any of the buildings in New York, so I hope it doesn’t turn you off because you think you got it simply figured out, because I promise there will be lots of new data and perspective gained from reading this that you probably haven’t seen before. There is much more intriguing things about 9/11 rather than the usual focus on the physics of the buildings, and that the cover-up of 9/11 is far wider than just omitting explosives being used.
But what is worse and current popular trend, are the far more ridiculously held beliefs by truth movement (or whatever is left of it anyway, depending if anybody still cares about war and foreign policy anymore?) about how 9/11 was physically carried out with free energy weapons on the WTC (possibly even from space) and or, that no planes were used on 9/11. Of course, none this is possibly true with the graphic and physical evidence as well the overwhelming witnesses and video footage that proves planes and explosives were used.
What I find odd is that even those who can see beyond that disinformation and deception, whether it’s a suspected asset figure or opportunist perpetuating these bogus “no plane” theories, is that still till this day, one of the still well held and kept beliefs by Truthers (most being schooled in the Loose Change film of thought) is that there were no passengers or hijackers on the planes, thus ultimately trying to rule out any Muslim or Arab involvement.
Now to be clear, I am not an anti-Semite or an islamophobe, but I am well researched in 9/11 with the different theories, especially a lot of the Israeli evidence that I’m well aware is controversial in itself direction (a predetermined repellent) and because of it, I have mostly based my implications in this direction of investigation, to see where it goes, other than just generically blame the CIA as all conspiracy circus cons do spin.
But 15 years later, I find it odd that the truth movement is still resists looking at any of the extensive evidence of the hijackers or other Muslims and Arab involvements in 9/11. And It’s very unfortunate and unneeded at this time with the recent revelation for state funding by Saudi Arabia on the partially revealed 28 Pages of the JIS report, which revealed that the Senate was able to come to this conclusion with reports from the same FBI field office’s which the damning reports on Israeli involvement in 9/11 come from. But all that’s been said by the majority of truth movement shepherds whether ignorant of FBI reports on the Dancing Israelis or not, is that the 28 pages does not benefit the cause for 9/11 truth, that in fact all it does is reinstate the official version.
That of course is pathetic, because for the last 15 years we haven’t come anywhere near putting an attack on Saudi Arabia to the table, as they are another one of our supposed allies in the Middle East, although seemingly they are a much closer ally to Israel. And with the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) law passing Congress in 2016 , allowing “civil claims against a foreign state for injuries, death, or damages from an act of international terrorism”, I believe is a signal of success and a needed path to go.
Points being, whether a Truther is savvy or un-savvy to the Israeli evidence, there general consensus is that the U.S. government had a large hand in it, and or did most of 9/11.
Some that are wiser will believe that Israel had a larger hand in it then the U.S. did, or that Israel was totally behind it.
However, if you look at all the physical evidence of the attacks for what they are, whether it be airplanes, moving vans or anything else, along with foiled attempts, it suggests a much broader network by including these additional activities as well original planning for an earlier date for the attacks, the culprits and suspects seems to lead verifiably to Arabs and Israelis working together in concert, and it goes far back.
Yes, the planes struck their targets at a precision like, stunt pilot capability that the hijackers wouldn’t have likely been able to perform. But those things can be explained away by remote control guidance from ground support, which is something that would have been an indication that the operation extended past 19 people. And that would be during a time where the media was being cautious of what stories they were reporting, so not to stir any more panic and attacks on American Muslims, and could also be an additional explanation for a default cover up, as to why they started limiting and downsizing all the news reports that day of bombs and graphic evidence of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
But one of the common arguments Truthers claim as evidence that there were no hijackers on 9/11, is that supposedly 7 of hijackers were reported being alive after 9/11. Some claim 9 hijackers and we are mostly going to go over those, which are generally cited as:
Now you would think some of these reports might be true, but you find most of them are not, especially with Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi about their travel experiences and also being involved in the USS Cole bombing makes them fits the M.O. for the mission, along with the fact there suspected accomplice pilot, Hani Hanjour had been readily available and living in the U.S. the longest out of any hijacker. However it is also worth considering that these reports of being alive that ended up proven false may have been cultivated by other culprits to cover or derail the authorities in their investigation.
However, there is a chance that some of the supposed hijackers involved in possibly also being handlers or orchestrators, who were not reported alive, may have not been part of the final M.O. and did actually live after 9/11, by fleeing last minute.
But most of the reported hijackers alive were supposedly victims of identities theft, and turned out to be a completely different people then the accused hijacker and were likely mix ups by the authorities due to having similar tribal names, which as you will see here, could have also been an intentional method the culprits used to leave no trace of who the hijackers actually were.
Another irrational claim Truthers will also try to add about the official hijacker list, is the delusion that everything was all scripted, and the proof is how quick authorities were able to identify exactly all 19 of the hijackers so soon the next day.
Well that’s not true at all, and according to History Commons, Robert Bonner the head of Customs and Border Protection, was one of the officials that spread this myth later testifying in the NEW YORK OBSERVER 2/15/2004 that:
“We ran passenger manifests through the system used by Customs—two were hits on our watch list of August 2001.” (Presumably referencing watch-listed hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar having been linked to the USS Cole Bombing) “And by looking at the Arab names and their seat locations, ticket purchases and other passenger information, it didn’t take a lot to do a rudimentary link analysis. Customs officers were able to ID 19 probable hijackers within 45 minutes. I saw the sheet by 11 a.m. And that analysis did indeed correctly identify the terrorists.”
But as History Commons also points out, this is incorrect, because for two days after the attacks (see September 13, 2001-September 14, 2001), the FBI believed that there were only 18 hijackers. And 4 of the 5 hijackers names presumes to have been on Flight 11 that crashed in the north tower, was wrong.
However that’s not entirely accurate either, because the following day September 12, 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft held the first press conference stating they believed all four planes were hijacked by between 3 to 6 people per plane, while other network’s later reported that they had identified 12 hijackers that day, some stating that there may have been a total range of 12 to 24 hijackers on the four planes.
We will get into those reports on September 12th much later, but also big mistakes occurred when the media started displaying the first few hijackers, and who they were suggesting hijacked Flight 11 supposedly with Mohamed Atta.
In an article titled ‘Planes, Hijackers and Automobiles’ by Frank Levi written in 2002 for Mike Rivero’s whatreallyhappened.com, it charts and highlights some of the first mistakes of identifying and displaying photos of supposed hijackers who were alive.
These first five names, Mohamed Atta, Abdul Rahman Alomari, Adnan Zakaria Bukhari, Amer Abbas Bukhari and Amer Mohammed Kamfar were reported as Flight 11 hijackers.
The list of names was changed:
|Original Hijacker||Becomes New Hijacker|
|Mohamed Atta||Mohamed Atta|
|Adnan Bukhari||Waleed Alshehri|
|Amer Bukhari||Wail Alshehri|
|Abdul Rahman Alomari||Abdulaziz al-Omari|
|Amer Kamfar||Satam Al Suqami|
The FBI’s investigation began by searching names on the 4 flight manifests (passenger lists) and then tracing the whereabouts and movements prior to the attacks. 6 suspects were chosen from the manifests and quickly investigated in the days immediately after the attacks. They were these same early suspects for Flight 11 including Flight 175’s Marwan al-Shehhi who was also suspected of being Atta’s cousin at the time.
However, by September 13th, Adnan Bukhari, Amer Bukhari, Abdul Alomari and Amer Kamfar were retracted from the list.
On September 12th, the first 2 photos of supposed 9/11 hijackers were displayed by mainstream media, which were photos of Mohamed Atta and Adnan Bukhari.
The first 4 hijacker names were reported by authorities having believed they were involved directly in the attacks and dead, while also circumspect to add, that they were also looking for them in the chance that they weren’t dead, were Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Adnan Bukhari and Amer Bukhari. And as it turns out, 3 of the first 5 false names were actually discovered alive.
Adnan Bukhari ended up being found alive after authorities raided his home in Vero Beach, Florida at 5:30 a.m. September 12th. Agents evacuated nearby houses, citing concerns that Adnan Bukhari’s house was rigged with explosives, FBI authorities had taken him to Miami for questioning where he then was released.
The hunt for Adnan was so grand, it was global, these early hijacker names were also submitted to other foreign intelligence and authorities, and in a nation who was not a stranger to U.S. official’s after having previously engaged and cooperated on handling international terrorism, Philippine authorities arrested a Saudi Arabian Airlines pilot named Mohammad Omar Al-“Bokhari”, as it sounded similar to “Bukhari” and is almost spelled the same.
CNN’s Mike Boettcher officially reported on September 14th, the retraction of the early report that Amer Bukhari was Adnan’s brother and listed under the same address.
“We would like to correct a report that appeared on CNN. Based on information from multiple law enforcement sources, CNN reported, that Adnan Bukhari and Amer Bukhari of Vero Beach Florida, were suspected to be two of the pilots who crashed planes into the World Trade Center. CNN later learned that Adnan Bukhari is still in Florida, where he was questioned by the FBI. We are sorry for the misinformation. A federal law enforcement source now tells CNN that Bukhari passed an FBI polygraph and is not considered a suspect. Through his attorney, Bukhari says that he is helping authorities. Ameer Bukhari died in a small plane crash last year..”
Some news sources also posted Adnan’s photos as being Amer Bukhari; by using a 2nd photo of Adnan, as well as numerous misspellings.
Not only had the media misreported that Adnan was not Amer’s brother, but Amer was already dead. He died not because of being on any of the planes from 9/11, but because of piloting a Cessna plane that crashed from a midair collision exactly one year to the day prior to 9/11, on September 11th, 2000.
While searching Adnan’s house, they announced that they had found a copy of Amer Bukhari’s pilot license, and a “hazardous materials manual”. However no such license ever appeared in the early news reports. The pilot licenses that were shown were either Adnan Bukhari’s or Amer Kamfar who was also alive and had lived near Adnan, but had just recently moved back to Saudi Arabia.
The Irish Times reported on September 15, 2001, that “According to Mr Kamfar’s neighbours, he lived with his wife and four children near Mr Alomari. Two weeks ago a van pulled up and the entire family left suddenly.” They discarded much of their clothing and other belongings in the trash.
Before being discovered alive in Saudi Arabia, FBI had but a BOLO (Be On the Look Out) on Kamfar, which already suggested that authorities suspected he wasn’t on Flight 11 by then, claiming he was “connected to the attacks” and warned that he should be considered armed and dangerous, and that he was driving a silver 1996 Plymouth Voyager carrying a AK-47
Not only had Kamfar lived near Adnan, another accused pilot of being a 9/11 hijacker, Abdul Rahman Alomari, had lived next-door to Adnan. He was also alive and falsely accused of being supposed hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari.
Abdul Rahman Alomari was a pilot and student at Flight Safety International as well as Adnan and Kamfar. According to Wikipedia, Abdul Rahman Alomari “had moved out of his Vero Beach, Florida residence with his wife and four children on September 3, 2001” ~
According to the People’s Daily, September 13th, the landlord of Adnan Bukhari, Paul Stimeling said that the wife and children of the next-door neighbor moved out over the weekend, and that “The Bukhari family, the landlord said, moved out at the end of August”. Bukhari had sent his family to Saudi Arabia but was still temporarily in the country.
CNN’s Susan Candiotti had interviewed Stimeling on September 12th:
CANDIOTTI: Can you tell if so how long this individual have been renting the house from you
STIMELING: Since June 10th of 2000
CANDIOTTI: And how much do they pay each month
CANDIOTTI: What can you tell us about them? What did you know, or who did you know them to be, or your tenant?
STIMELING: Just family men from Saudi Arabia that were here for a class, and they needed 15 months of this rental, and they’ve agreed to rent the property through the end of August.
CANDIOTTI: And what happened before the lease was up
STIMELING: They called me the last week in July and suggested they would need at least another two weeks, and again last week, to ask for another 2 or 3 days, they were to move on the 17th this coming Monday
According to St. Petersburg Times online, they reported on September 14th 2001, that Kamfar neighbor Walter R. Reed, claimed that “his family moved in eight months ago and moved out about 10 days ago. They had kept to themselves mostly, although their children played with other children in the neighborhood.”
St. Petersburg Times also reported that “Two weeks ago, Mrs. Bukhari and her children returned to Saudi Arabia”, neighbors said, and Mrs. Alomari and her children followed the next day. Plus, “Mr. Al-Omari moved in with Mr. Bukhari for about a week, then disappeared, neighbors said.”
What is particularly interesting about the St. Petersburg Times report, is that Bukhari’s neighbor, Raymond DeFossez, whose 10-year-old son Cody often played video games with the Bukhari and Alomari children, and said that Amer Bukhari was Adnan’s brother and that he was also a student at FlightSafety Academy and was killed in a mid-air collision over St. Lucie, and that Adnan had told him they planned to sue.
Well hold on here, I thought CNN and the other news clarified that Adnan cleared things up through the fortune of having a lawyer to the FBI along with taking a polygraph test, saying the Amer wasn’t his brother?
CNN also reported on September 14th, that spokesman for FlightSafety, Roger Richie, confirmed that Bukhari was a flight engineer with Saudi Airlines and part of a current yearlong program to train pilots for the airline. But for some reason, “He refused to discuss whether Kamfar or Alomari were connected to the program, although he did say the company turned over its records to the FBI.
According to Wikipedia, there were early false reports where “media also painted a suspicious picture of Kamfar, stating that he had “rushed off to Rooms to Go, a furniture store in Vero Beach, and as news of the kamikaze attacks was breaking on a television in the showroom, bought a $1,795 living room set.” Of course none of this is possible since it’s been established that Kamfar was already in Saudi Arabia. Of course Wikipedia concludes as it already has for Adnan, that Kamfar was cleared of any wrongdoing.
However this furniture store story was partially true, just not that it was Kamfar, it was actually Adnan Bukhari who purchased the living room set. A furniture store salesman interviewed by CBS, later broadcasted September 14th, claimed that Adnan was shopping in the store on the day of the attacks and purchased a living room set and wanted to have it shipped immediately to Saudi Arabia, but also making an indication to the salesman, that he himself is urgently moving back to Saudi Arabia too. Also from what was seen by the news cameras entering Adnan Bukhari’s house, most of the items inside were packed in boxes ready to move.
At this point it would seem there is something very wrong with Adnan Bukhari and his neighbor’s alibis. What would be the odds that these pilots prolonged there move back to Saudi Arabia, only to move back under such suspicious circumstances, that seems a possibility of preparation and priority of executing the first two planes, stalling enough time for any real handling or assisting culprits to get away, while authorities were left on a wild goose trail that would be impossible to thoroughly and accurately identify exactly who hijacked the planes from Boston Logan, which is also two of the three only airports(Newark included) where any security video has never been provided of hijackers being captured going through the gates or anywhere in those two airports till this day, but we will also get into that further head too.